Aging-US: DNA- and Telomere-damage Does Not Limit Lifespan: Evidence From Rapamycin (Medicine)

Blagosklonny concluded in his Aging-US Research Output that here he discussed new evidence that normal aging is not caused by accumulation of molecular damage or telomere shortening

Aging-US published “DNA- and telomere-damage does not limit lifespan: evidence from rapamycin” which reported that failure of rapamycin to extend lifespan in DNA repair mutant and telomerase-knockout mice, while extending lifespan in normal mice, indicates that neither DNA damage nor telomere shortening limits normal lifespan or causes normal aging.

Dr. Mikhail V. Blagosklonny said, “As a provocative title has recently announced, ‘rapamycin fails to extend lifespan in DNA repair -deficient mice’ [1]. The word ‘fails’ implies bad news. Rapamycin tried but failed. Yet, it is expected that the anti-aging drug rapamycin should not restore lifespan of short-lived mice that fail to grow and die young from causes other than normal aging [2]. In such growth- retarded mice, rapamycin, an inhibitor of cell growth, further retards weight gain.”

While shortening lifespan by 18% in unnatural telomerase- deficient mice, in the same study in natural mice, rapamycin increased lifespan by 39% and healthspan by 58%.

In dozens of independent studies, rapamycin has not failed to extend lifespan in normal mice.

However, while extending lifespan in normal mice, rapamycin may fail to save animals dying young from cellular growth retardation.

The failure of rapamycin to extend lifespan in these short- lived mice, dying from DNA damage, rules out the damage theory of aging and to illustrate this point the author first discusses what limits animal lifespan by providing commentary on 1. Quasi-programmed (hyperfunctional) aging and 2. How molecular damage can become life- limiting

Blagosklonny concluded in his Aging-US Research Output that here he discussed new evidence that normal aging is not caused by accumulation of molecular damage or telomere shortening: while extending normal lifespan in mice, rapamycin failed to do so in mice dying from molecular damage.

Previously, several lines of evidence suggested that molecular damage does not cause normal aging. Their detailed discussion is beyond the focus of this article, so he just mentions some of them, without referencing them.

1. Overexpression of enzymes that decrease damage does not extend lifespan in most studies. Similarly, antioxidants do not extend lifespan in animals and may increase mortality in humans. Furthermore, even data that support damage theory can be explained by other mechanisms. For example, N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine, a commonly used anti- oxidant, can inhibit mTOR.
2. According to calculations, molecular damage, especially mtDNA mutations and telomere shortening, cannot reach a deadly threshold during animal lifetime.
3. Genetic knockout of signaling pathways can extend lifespan without affecting molecular damage. Similarly, pharmacological interventions can extend life without affecting damage accumulation.
4. Dramatic intra- and inter-species differences in lifespan poorly correlate with the rate of molecular damage.
5. Nuclear transfer and nuclear reprogramming both rule out DNA damage as a cause of aging. Following adult somatic cell nuclear transfer, cloned animals are healthy and have normal lifespan.
6. Low levels of molecular damage may increase longevity. This phenomenon is known as hormesis. Regardless of mechanistic explanations, this indicates that molecular damage is not-life-limiting even when moderately increased.
7. Rapamycin increases lifespan in all normal animals tested, indicating that mTORC1-dependent quasi-program is life-limiting.

Once again, damage accumulates and must cause death eventually, but quasi-programmed aging terminates life first. Molecular damage can become life-limiting, when artificially accelerated or, potentially, when quasi-programmed aging is decelerated.

Featured image: Rapamycin extends lifespan in natural but not progeroid mice. (A) Natural mice. Hyperfunctional aging (green/yellow/red arrow) progresses from development (green) to diseases (red), reaching death threshold and limiting lifespan. Accumulation of molecular damage (gray arrow) is slow and does not reach death threshold in animal lifetime. It would take longer to die from molecular damage. Treatment with rapamycin (RAPA) extends lifespan by slowing down mTOR-driven aging (B) Progeroid, telomerase- or DNA-repair-deficient mice. Accumulation of molecular damage (gray arrow) is artificially accelerated to become life-limiting. Treatment with rapamycin (RAPA) cannot extend lifespan. Copyright: © 2021 Blagosklonny


Reference: Blagosklonny MV. DNA- and telomere-damage does not limit lifespan: evidence from rapamycin. Aging (Albany NY). 2021; 13:3167-3175. DOI – https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.202674 Full Text – https://www.aging-us.com/article/202674/text


Provided by Impact Journals LLC

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s