CT Colonography Most Effective Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Test for Advanced Neoplasia (Medicine)

According to an open-access article in ARRS’ American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), compared with multi-target stool-DNA (mt-sDNA) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT), CT colonography (CTC) with ≥ 10 mm threshold most effectively targets advanced neoplasia (AN)—preserving detection while decreasing unnecessary colonoscopies.  

“CTC performed with a polyp size threshold for colonoscopy referral set at ≥ 10 mm represents the most effective and efficient non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention and detection,” clarified first author Perry J. Pickhardt from the department of radiology at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health.   

Because the relative performance characteristics of available noninvasive tests had not yet been adequately compared, Pickhardt’s team systematically searched PubMed and Google Scholar, including 10 mt-sDNA, 27 CTC, and 88 FIT published screening studies involving 25,132, 33,4932, and 2,355,958 asymptomatic adults, respectively. To determine test-positivity rates (TPR) leading to optical colonoscopy (OC), as well as positive predictive value (PPV) and detection rate (DR) for both AN and CRC, meta-analysis with hierarchical Bayesian modeling was conducted, in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA guidelines.

“CTC performed with a polyp size threshold for colonoscopy referral set at ? 10 mm represents the most effective and efficient non-invasive screening test for CRC prevention and detection,” clarified first author Perry J. Pickhardt from the department of radiology at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health. © American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS), American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR)

Pickhardt and colleagues’ results showed that CRC prevention via screen detection of AN was highest with CTC, followed by mt- sDNA, and lowest with FIT due to the differing TPR and PPV, although overlap existed in the 95% CIs when accounting for uncertainty. Compared with mt-sDNA and CTC6, FIT and CTC10 strategies yielded substantially lower colonoscopy resource utilization, while mt-sDNA performance appeared to be similar to FIT at low positivity thresholds.

Acknowledging that each CRC screening option has relative advantages and disadvantages that should be carefully considered and tailored to the individual, “in the end,” the authors of this AJR article concluded, “the ‘best’ test may be the one that the patient is willing to undergo.”
An electronic supplement to this article is available here.

Featured image: Pickhardt and colleagues’ results showed that CRC prevention via screen detection of AN was highest with CTC, followed by mt- sDNA, and lowest with FIT due to the differing TPR and PPV, although overlap existed in the 95% CIs when accounting for uncertainty. Compared with mt-sDNA and CTC6, FIT and CTC10 strategies yielded substantially lower colonoscopy resource utilization, while mt-sDNA performance appeared to be similar to FIT at low positivity thresholds. © American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS), American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR)


Reference: Perry J. Pickhardt, Loredana Correale and Cesare Hassan, “PPV and Detection Rate of mt-sDNA, FIT, and CT Colonography for Advanced Neoplasia: A Hierarchical Bayesian Meta-Analysis of the Noninvasive Colorectal Screening Tests”, American Journal of Roentgenology, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.25416


Provided by American Roengten Ray Society

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s