Skoltech Scientists Create A New Electronegativity Scale (Chemistry)

Skoltech chemists have proposed a new electronegativity scale and published their findings in Nature Communications.

The concept of electronegativity introduced by Linus Pauling, a great American chemist, in the 1930s refers to the ability of an atom to attract electron density. In a chemical bond, the more electronegative atom gains extra electrons, becoming negatively charged, while the less electronegative one loses electrons and becomes positively charged. Electronegativity is a fundamental notion, essential for explaining things that range from the energy of chemical bonds to the (in)stability of chemical compounds and the color and hardness of crystals.

Since then, chemists have come up with various definitions and scales of electronegativity. Yet Pauling’s scale is the first and the most common one, present in every chemistry textbook. Pauling deduced his electronegativity values from thermochemistry using the energies of  some chemical bonds. He proposed the simplest formula to calculate stabilization of a bond due to the difference in electronegativity between the atoms. It later transpired that the predictions made with Pauling’s scale had rather low accuracy.

Skoltech professor Artem R. Oganov and research scientist Christian Tantardini ventured to modify Pauling’s formula and redefine the electronegativities of elements and ended up creating a new scale of electronegativity.

“It all started when we decided to calculate Pauling’s electronegativities under pressure. The chemistry of high pressures is quite exotic, but you will likely be able to understand a lot of things once you find out how electronegativities of elements change under pressure. We used Pauling’s definition to calculate electronegativity under normal conditions and were amazed to discover that his scale did not match either theoretical or experimental bond energies for significantly ionic molecules. Moreover, many publications in chemical literature mention this inconsistency but none offer a consistent solution. I realized that the root cause was that Pauling treated the molecule’s ionic stabilization as an additive effect, while if we consider it as a multiplicative effect, many drawbacks will be removed. With the new formula and experimental energies of chemical bonds, we determined the electronegativities of all the elements and obtained a beautiful scale that works both for small and large differences in electronegativity,” Professor Oganov explains.

The new scale uses electronegativity as a dimensionless quantity, which is very practical, and accurately reproduces the energies of both molecules and chemical reactions.

Featured image: Atomization energies predicted from thermochemical electronegativities (x-axis) for a number of simple molecules in comparison with experimental atomization energies on y-axis. © Tantardini et al.


Reference: Tantardini, C., Oganov, A.R. Thermochemical electronegativities of the elements. Nat Commun 12, 2087 (2021). https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22429-0 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22429-0


Provided by Skoltech

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s