Research on the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, also known as the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, indicates that a long interval between first and second doses does not compromise the immune response after a late second dose.
Additionally, a third dose of the vaccine continues to boost antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. The results were released in a preprint today.
COVID-19 vaccine supply shortages are causing concerns in some countries about compromised immunity as the interval between first and second dose extends due to limited vaccine availability. When examining the effects of a delay of up to 45 weeks between first and second doses in study participants, results demonstrated that antibody levels were increased after a delayed second dose. Additionally, a longer delay between first and second doses may be beneficial, resulting in an increased antibody titre and enhanced immune response after the second dose.
Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, Professor of Paediatric Infection and Immunity and Lead Investigator of the Oxford University trial of the vaccine, says, ‘This should come as reassuring news to countries with lower supplies of the vaccine, who may be concerned about delays in providing second doses to their populations. There is an excellent response to a second dose, even after a 10 month delay from the first.’
Conversely, some countries are considering administering a third ‘booster’ dose in the future. Studying the impact of a third vaccine dose, the researchers found that antibody titres increased significantly with a third dose. T-cell response and the immune response against variants were also boosted.
‘It is not known if booster jabs will be needed due to waning immunity or to augment immunity against variants of concern,’ says Associate Professor Teresa Lambe OBE, lead senior author for these studies. ‘Here we show that a third dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 is well tolerated and significantly boosts the antibody response. This is very encouraging news, if we find that a third dose is needed.’
Side effects of the vaccine itself were also found to be well-tolerated, with lower incidents of side effects after second and third doses than after first doses.
Further research is required to follow up with study participants who received third doses beyond the period that was part of the initial study.
Featured image: Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine © Oxford University
Reference: Flaxman, Amy and Marchevsky, Natalie and Jenkin, Daniel and Aboagye, Jeremy and Aley, Parvinder K. and Angus, Brian John and Belij-Rammerstorfer, Sandra and Bibi, Sagida and Bittaye, Mustapha and Cappuccini, Federica and Cicconi, Paola and Clutterbuck, Elizabeth and Davies, Sophie and Dejnirattisai, Wanwisa and Dold, Christina and Ewer, Katie and Folegatti, Pedro M. and Fowler, Jamie and Hill, Adrian V. S. and Kerridge, Simon and Minassian, Angela M. and Mongkolspaya, Juthathip and Farooq Mujadidi, Yama and Plested, Emma and Ramasamy, Maheshi N. and Robinson, Hannah and Sanders, Helen and Sheehan, Emma and Smith, Holly and Snape, Matthew D. and Song, Rinn and Woods, Danielle and Screaton, Gavin R. and Gilbert, Sarah C. and Voysey, Merryn and Pollard, Andrew and Lambe, Teresa and Group, The Oxford COVID Vaccine, Tolerability and Immunogenicity After a Late Second Dose or a Third Dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3873839 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3873839
Provided by University of Oxford